|
The
validation of physiotherapy is based on the criterias
linked to the EBM : Evidence Based
Medicine , which validates a disciplin
and a practice of medicine which also forms a reference for
authorities in order to use health care funds at their best.
This
concept is already applied in all the domains of medicine,
it can also be applied to physiotherapy. Still it appears very
academic and almost inapplicable in its strict meaning, risking to
deprive some patients of potentially efficient
treatments. Many patients suffer from a such
mixed syndromes that disqualify them for the random controlled
assays. This problem is linked to the particular methodology
of the meta-analysis. The 2 following examples of CPT:
In the case the CPT in cystic fibrosis ,
two meta-analysis lead to two contradictory results. A first
evaluation concludes on the useful role of CPT versus the
absence of treatment (Thomas J. et al. .
Chest physical therapy management of
patients with cystic fibrosis. A
Meta-analysis. Am J Respir Crit
Care Med 1995; 151: 846-50.), another analysis indicates that
the role of CPT is not clearly established (Vanderschans
C. et al. Chest physiotherapy compared to no chest physiotherapy
for cystic fibrosis (Cochrane Review). In: The Cochrane Library,
issue 2, 2000. Oxford: Update Software). On the base of these
works, doubt is allowed but the question remains
: which doctor would dear to adopt an attentist
attitude and so deprive his little patient from CPT treatment ?
The second example relates to CPT when applied to bronchiolitis
in infancy. The analysis of the rare papers in English litterature
concludes to the inefficacy of CPT, while two French papers in
contrary plead in favor of CPT. A
meta-analysis is here useless, due to the lack of works, it
would probably conclude to a lack of arguments in favor
of CPT. However, the "Conférence
de Consensus Francophone sur la Bronchiolite
du Nourrisson
(Paris 2000)" concluded the other way, and recognized the
role held by CPT on any other therapeutic measurement,
medication being found inefficient and sometimes useless.
From
the above examples, the lesson to remember is that clinical
common sense must prevail. This attitude has the major
advantage that it does not deprive any patient from a chance to
benefit from a potentially positive treatment,
that anyway seems to be on the clinical standpoint. The
result should then appear as a subtle equilibrium between hardline
application of the EBM and a more personal approach where the
clinics itself, the experience of the PT and the bases of
physiology feed the decision.
This
permits to point out the interest of consensus
conferences where arguments are less mathematical than the EBM
process but rather leaves the place to convicting opinions
. Like medicine, physiotherapy is also a science to be
applied
with art.
Our
method contains a double approach : scientific
arguments brought by the results of our studies, development
of the clinical sense and collection of semiological
parameters in the scope of the specific CPT assessment.
E-Mail:
postiaux.guy@chndrf.be
|